Skip to content

multiple pydantic model validators bug fixed #215

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

dapper91
Copy link
Owner

@dapper91 dapper91 commented Oct 3, 2024

  • multiple pydantic model validators bug fixed.

@dapper91 dapper91 merged commit cff13b4 into dev Oct 3, 2024
5 checks passed
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 3, 2024

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.05%. Comparing base (9a2f5c1) to head (e880382).
Report is 2 commits behind head on dev.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #215   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.05%   92.05%           
=======================================
  Files          29       29           
  Lines        1648     1648           
=======================================
  Hits         1517     1517           
  Misses        131      131           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 92.05% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dapper91 dapper91 deleted the model-validator-bugfix branch October 3, 2024 17:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants